February 14-17, 2007

THE HUNGARIAN REVOLUTION OF 1956 AND AFTER:
IMPACT AND CONTRIBUTIONS

CONFERENCE AND A 50TH REUNION OF HUNGARIAN STUDENT REFUGEES AT BARD COLLEGE
 

From Wednesday, February 14, through Saturday, February 17, 2007, Bard College celebrated the more than 300 Hungarian freedom fighter refugees who arrived on the Annandale-on-Hudson campus beginning in December 1956, fresh from the Hungarian Revolution.

 

50th Anniversary Reunion of the Hungarian refugees whom Bard College hosted and taught following the Hungarian Revolution in 1956


 
On December 22, 1956, during Bard's Winter Field Period, the first of the Hungarian freedom fighter refugees arrived in Annandale, while the Bard students were mostly absent from campus. The freedom fighters had to flee Hungary when their Revolution against Communist dictatorship was crushed in November 1956. The College provided orientation to the United States for the Hungarian freedom fighters as well as English language instruction.

 

 

Panel on "Refugee Intellectuals & the American Experience" - Tibor Frank, David Kettler, Erwin Levold, and Nóra Kovács

 

Fifty years later, Bard invited all the alumni/ae of the program to campus for a reunion. The College sought to celebrate their time here and to provide an opportunity for them to share their memories of the events of the Revolution and their earliest memories in the United States with each other and with current students, and faculty.

 

Miklós Haraszti, one of the founders of the Hungarian opposition movement and OSCE's Representative on  Freedom of the Media



Coinciding with the reunion, Bard held an international conference, "The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and After: Impact and Contributions." The conference reconsidered the Hungarian revolution, its impact on the world and on the freedom fighters' future lives. The two-and-a-half-day event included lectures, panel discussions, films, concerts, and informal discussions with faculty and students.

 

 

Zoltán Fehér, diplomat of the Embassy and Bard alumnus, greeted the conference on behalf of Ambassador Simonyi and co-chaired the panel discussion on "Contributions of Hungarian Emigré to Contemporary Society"


 
Speakers included Jonathan Becker, director of Global and International Studies Program; Csaba Békés, author of The 1956 Hungarian Revolution and World Politics and visiting scholar of history at New York University; László Bitó '60, author and professor of ocular physiology at Columbia University, and chairman, reunion organizing committee; Leon Botstein, President of Bard College; Malcolm Bilson '57, Frederick J. Whiton Professor of Music, Emeritus, at Cornell University; Ian Buruma, Henry R. Luce Professor of Human Rights and Journalism at Bard; Zoltán Fehér '02, alumnus of the Kellner Scholars at Bard, and chief creative officer at the Embassy of Hungary, Washington, D.C.; Tibor Frank, professor of history at the Department of American Studies at Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest; Éva Gárdos, writer, editor, and director; Miklós Haraszti, Hungarian poet, songmaker, writer, and one of the founders of the Hungarian Democratic Opposition Movement; Peter Kenez, professor of history, University of California, Santa Cruz; Thomas D. Kerenyi, M.D., associate clinical professor, obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive health, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; David Kettler, research professor in social studies, Bard College; Nóra Kovács '97, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe; Erwin Levold, chief archivist, Rockefeller Archive Center; Béla G. Lipták, editor of Instrument Engineers Handbook, and member, reunion organizing committee; Norman Manea, writer in residence at Bard; August Molnar, president, American Hungarian Foundation; István Rév, history professor at Central European University, and director of Open Society Archives; and György Tóth '02, alumnus of the Kellner Scholars at Bard, doctoral candidate in American Studies at the University of Iowa.
 
More information: http://hungary56.bard.edu/

 

New York Times: A Reunion of Refugees, Class of ’57

Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times

Laszlo Bito, right, organized a reunion of Hungarians who spent eight weeks at Bard College half a century ago after fleeing their country during the revolt against the Soviet Union.

  • By JOSEPH BERGER
  • joeberg@nytimes.com

Published: February 21, 2007

ANNANDALE-ON-HUDSON, N.Y.

The United States is still reaping the benefits of the 1956-57 session, which the refugees ended with a torchlight parade.

They were refugees of a failed uprising, most of them arriving penniless and alone, baffled by the language, knowing that returning home could mean jail or death.
But for eight weeks in the winter of 1956-57, roughly 300 Hungarians fleeing the Soviet tanks that crushed their startling revolt found a life raft in a small college 90 miles north of New York City.
Even if they could scarcely stop chatting in Hungarian, they learned enough English to manage the road ahead. Young men and women who served time in labor camps for being “class enemies” learned some of the peculiarities of a new country where police need not always be feared or bribed. They learned of scholarships that vaulted them to schools like Princeton and M.I.T. And, it’s worth noting, two refugees married each other.
Those eight weeks at Bard College so many years ago generated dividends that the United States is still collecting. Out of that passel of adrift newcomers emerged doctors, engineers, and scientists, including two leaders in the treatment of eye disease, Laszlo Bito and Frank Holly; a third, Sandor Holly, who developed an early laser; and a fourth, Charles Legendy, whose theories contributed to plasma generation used in making computer chips.
Over the weekend, when 30 of these onetime rebels got together here for a 50th anniversary reunion, bear-hugging onetime classmates, visiting dormitories where they had roomed, reminiscing about that strange interlude with a tart Mitteleuropean humor, there was also talk of some lessons that the United States needs to remind itself of in a post-9/11 world.
At a time when too many immigrant scholars are greeted with suspicion and often discouraged, the former refugees found it worth remembering that opening America’s unmatched university classrooms harnesses the zeal and quicksilver intelligence of the world’s best minds, and that a proper balance with security must be struck. “One reason we organized this is to show that not all immigrants are a burden to the United States and not all immigrants are to be feared,” said Mr. Bito.
After declining for several years, the numbers of foreign students enrolled in higher education last year rebounded to 565,000, the levels of the 2001-2 school year. America, it seems, is more dependent than ever on immigrants for its scientific skills. With Wall Street exerting an ever greater pull, one of every four doctors is foreign-born and half of all patents are issued to foreigners, according to Allan E. Goodman, president of the Institute of International Education.
Still there are repeated cases of professors and students who are humiliated or deterred by the visa gantlet. True, the United States happily gave more than 30,000 Hungarians sanctuary because they viewed them as freedom fighters in the same anti-Communist cause that was consuming this nation at the time. Today, many of the scholars and students challenged are from Middle Eastern countries, and some college officials question whether all are genuine security threats.
Leon Botstein, Bard’s president and the son of Nazi-era refugees, told how a lengthy visa processing prevented his school from gaining entry this semester for Youssef Yacoubi, a scholar in Arabic literature and British citizen of Moroccan descent, even though he taught at Bard in the fall.
Joanne Moore, a spokeswoman for the State Department, said, “We generally don’t talk about individual cases because of the issue of privacy.”
Mr. Botstein argued that rather than seeking to keep people out, the nation can use colleges to nurture habits of academic freedom, open argument and unbridled research that students can take back to their closed countries.
“This reunion is a reminder of how important it is for the American university to be responsive and open to students coming from abroad and seeking asylum,” he said.
Americans are obviously ambivalent. Last year the Bush administration pledged to continue reducing visa restrictions imposed after the Sept. 11 attacks, in response to complaints from universities about the first drop in the number of foreign students in the United States in more than three decades.
These days, in sharp contrast with cases where bureaucrats seem ready to bar the door, stand programs like one run by the Institute of International Education, with financing by the State Department, which provides fellowships for eight Iranians to study here while teaching Farsi. “When they go back to Iran they will have an image of Americans which is totally different than what Iranians are getting on their television,” said Margot Steinberg, the institute’s chief development officer.

Bard stepped forward because it had a language professor, William Frauenfelder, who was a Swiss émigré. Bard had free dormitories because students spent winter breaks in field study, and it had language-drill laboratories. The Eisenhower administration, perhaps feeling guilty that it had encouraged the revolt but never intervened, arranged financing and there were contributions by the Ford Foundation. St. Michael’s College in Vermont and several other schools had smaller programs.
“We didn’t know whether we were coming or going,” said Esther Jankovics, whose ailing father and her mother remained in Hungary. “The whole idea of leaving the folks behind and starting a new life was very threatening and very anxiety-producing. With 100 percent honesty, Bard was a major emotional support.”
Ms. Jankovics, a career librarian, remembers how quickly the Hungarians picked up the American creed that “if you work hard you can do anything.” Sandor Holly, though, ended up concluding that “here everybody is a salesman — you have to sell your ideas; it’s not enough just to come up with a good idea.”
Bard also tried to acclimate the refugees to American culture and history. Mr. Bito, who when the uprising began on Oct. 23, 1956, was working in what he called the Dante’s Inferno of a forced-labor coal mine, remembers being shown films like “Citizen Kane” at Bard and hearing lectures by Eleanor Roosevelt and Roy Wilkins.
“We found out there were still lynchings in the South,” he said. “We couldn’t believe it. We had thought it was all Communist propaganda.”
Mr. Bito, a slender, bearded man with a well-earned sense of life’s absurdities, became a professor of ocular physiology at Columbia and helped develop the glaucoma drug Xalatan. Now living mostly in Budapest, he writes novels.
The Hungarians were celebrities of a sort — Time magazine had just featured the Hungarian freedom fighter as its Man of the Year — so neighbors in Rhinebeck and Red Hook invited them to dinner. They met Gov. W. Averell Harriman and rattled him by lifting him on their shoulders.
HE was surprised,” said Bela Liptak. “It was not proper Anglo-Saxon behavior.” Mr. Liptak, a tall, elegant man of 70, was a leader among the student revolutionaries and went on to become an automation expert. He remembered other grace notes that eased his alienation. “A package was left at the door of my room, with brand-new clothing, clean and my size, and no note of any kind,” recalled Mr. Liptak. “I never found out who sent it.”
He organized a Hungarian student association and arranged scholarships for 1,200 refugees. Bard was where he met his wife, Martha, now a ceramics artist, after she threw away a job as a cleaning lady and borrowed $10 to take a train upstate.
The Hungarians are not Pollyannaish about how America treated them. They arrived, after all, when McCarthy era paranoia had not yet died out. Karl Verebey, naïvely put down on his Bard application that he had been a member of a Communist youth group. He was monitored by the F.B.I. for the next 10 years. Still, he went on to become New York’s chief toxicologist during the Dinkins administration.