Live Interview with C-SPAN Host Connie Doebele
Washington Journal, February 18, 2003

 

Connie Doebele: Our guest is the Hungarian Ambassador to the United States, András Simonyi, who joins us to talk about his country and how it is partnering with the United States in an attempt to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Why are you involved?

András Simonyi: Connie, first of all, we are allies. And also because we have always said that we would like to resolve this crisis with the United Nations by peaceful means, but we have also added, if it is not possible by peaceful means,  we are going to have to resort to force and that’s what we have said in the last couple of months, and we stick to that and as we move on I think the international community is increasingly realizing that this might have to be the case.

CD: Will there be a second UN resolution?

AS: That I cannot tell you. We hope, but that I cannot tell you at this moment.

CD: Why do you hope?

AS: Because I think we have to make sure that the United Nations fulfills its role, that the United Nations also by showing strength stays credible, and I think it’s important, it’s a cornerstone of our international security system. It’s in our interest that the United Nations does what it has to do.

CD: What is Hungary offering to be part of the coalition?

AS: Right now Hungary has offered a base, where Iraqi opposition persons are being trained and that’s the way we have contributed but we are going to assist by other means too, which I cannot describe to you at this moment.

CD: Ok. Let’s just talk about the training then. Where is the base?

AS: First of all, I hope you, viewers know that Hungary is a Central European country surrounded by other seven Central European states and it’s a country which has a languages that is quite strange because its not related to the Slavic languages to which all other languages are related. Now, this training base is south of Budapest, close to the Croatian border, and I might want to tell you that this is a base that has been used by the Alliance, by NATO in the efforts to bring peace to Bosnia and in the efforts to bring peace to Kosovo as well.

CD: So, what kind of training are they receiving there?

AS: They’re receiving training, there’re interpreters, guides, etc and this is pretty much a civilian type of training they are receiving.

CD: Civilian type of training, meaning …?

AS: Well, interpretation and guides and people who know, who know about Iraq, but that’s all I can tell you know.

CD: And is this the major base in your country?

AS: This only one of the bases, but as I said, this base has been used by NATO forces, by American forces, by American troops earlier in the crisis in Bosnia and in the crisis for Kosovo, and it has served our cooperation very well, and you might want to know that Hungarians are also involved in the operation. Not in the training though, but in the operation, in protecting the base, etc.

CD: How many members of the armed forces do you have in Hungary?

AS: Well, we have an approximately 40,000-strong armed force. And well, big or small, I don’t know but I hope it’s a good one.

CD: In comparison to how many people?

AS: In comparison to ten million inhabitants.

CD: And do you see the day in which you might actually have troops on the ground in Iraq?

AS: Look, we have not discussed that, but at this moment there is no talk about that.

CD: And what about, we were discussing earlier this morning, the fly-over rights, the country giving rights to the United States or to the United Nations for fly-overs. Has Hungary given that?

AS: We are debating that, and that means certain decisions and these decisions are in the making.

CD: What about your own country? Are you finding any anti-war protests there?

AS: Look, no one wants war. Hungarians don’t want war. Perhaps the anti-war protests in Hungary are not as visible as elsewhere in Europe, there might be several explanations for that, but of course the Hungarian population, as others, and as I see, Americans, too, don’t want war. But of course Hungarians perhaps have a better understanding for why democracies might have to go to war. Look, in 1956 the international community, democracies failed to act, in 1939, democracies failed to act against Hitler. In 1956, because of the inaction of democracies Hungary got occupied by a foreign power for 50 years and therefore probably Hungarians have a pretty good understanding of what happens when democracies fail to move.

CD: The Hungarian Ambassador to the United States is our guest. He is going to take your questions regarding his country’s involvement in all of this and here is how you can join us. Phone numbers are on the bottom of your screen. First call for him is from Aleita, Kansas. Hello, Aleita, go ahead.

Caller 1: First of all I want to commend you on your country, on your support. I can only support the policy of the United States and President Bush, and I was wondering about your reaction to the critics, generally apprehensive about the prospects of war, based on this statement: what are we going to do with every dictator in the world who might be able to pass on weapons of mass destruction to someone who might harm us, or are we going to go fight every one of these dictators? And I am wondering if the United Nations actually would stand in force against these dictators one by one and force them out. This is 2003. Why are we considering doing that?

AS: Well, Aleita thank you very much for you question. First of all, why we support what has been done so far, and what has been said so far by the American administration, is because we support peace. It’s not that we support war. We just think that in order to find a peaceful solution we have to be credible in being able to use arms if necessary. I also want to tell you, that of course there is a lot of criticism. We are really interested in making sure that there is no rift between Europe and America on this issue. Europe and America have to stick together, the threats and challenges that you were talking about for the future can only be faced if there is no rift between the United States and its European allies, that’s what Hungary is working on. And on your last question what we’ll have to do with all the dictators and all the bad regimes. Well, here is what we think. We certainly think that if Iraq becomes a democratic nation that will ignite a process of democratization so that we do not have to go to war in each and every case. What we have to get prepared for and I think Americans and Europeans have to get prepared for, the terrorism, is something that we will have to fight continuously and as I said we have to stick together.

CD: You have had in your professional carrier background at NATO.

AS: That’s right. I spent almost nine years of my life at NATO, and it was hard work. But here is something that I have been thinking about in the last couple of weeks. I have seen tough situations between America and Europe before and the real good news is that we always found a way to resolve any crisis or possibility of rift and I think that is exactly what is going to happen now.

CD: And the role of NATO today?

AS: NATO has to stay credible. NATO has to stay important. NATO is the only real trans-Atlantic instrument and this has to be the institution of choice for the future as well.

CD: Next call is from New Orleans. Hello, New Orleans, go ahead.

Caller 2: Good morning, Mr. Ambassador. It is nice to see you on TV here in the United States. My question would be to you, one gets the impression that Hungary is on its way to sabotage the European Union because, it’s a well-known fact, the U.S. has only invested 2 %  in Hungary, in rebuilding Hungary’s economy, while other nations like Germany have almost 40% invested and the United States has the least of investment in Hungary. So I think you have to be very careful not to participate in a rift in the European Union, that is very crucial for Europe. Thank you. Because the might of the U.S. can never be duplicated anywhere. Thank you.

AS: Thank you very much. I didn’t really get your name, but I just want to tell you, first of all, I’d love to come down to New Orleans and speak to you in person. You are wrong about American investments. American investments have been crucial in stabilizing the Hungarian economy in its transitional phase. American investments amount to almost 30-35 % of the total investments coming from abroad in Hungary. So that’s a pretty important chunk of the investments. But please do not try to put the American and European investments up against each other because they are both crucial. We have coined a phrase saying, as Hungary joins the European Union “more Europe” does not mean “less America,” meaning that Hungary does not want to be in a situation where it has to choose. Hungary will be a good European Union member and it will remain a strong and stubborn trans-Atlantic ally. So I just want to make sure that we are not working against the European Union. On the contrary, that’s what we are working for. And that is what the famous letter signed by the eight European leaders, including my prime minister, was about: making sure there is no rift. The message was that Saddam Hussein should not be able to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States.

CD: Has the United States promised Hungary anything in exchange for its programs or anything it might do in the future?

AS: Absolutely not. And that’s why it is so important that everybody understands. We do this because we think this is right, and we are going to follow our line and we will stick to it and I think more and more countries are coming around to understand that this is the right position to take.

CD: York from California, good morning.

AS: Good morning, Mr. Ambassador. You touched a little bit today on what I was going to ask. The last couple of callers kind of bothered me because that’s what sovereignty is all about. I know in Hungary you had an uprising, I think in ’55 or ’56, against the Soviet Union to obtain that sovereignty and I think most of Eastern Europe was under repression from the Soviet Union, so I would like to know a little bit more about how the Eastern European countries appreciate that sovereignty. And one other thing about Iraq. People seem to think that we’re not going to be welcome in Iraq and I think when we entered France, when the British and American troops entered Paris in 1944, we were welcome as liberators, not conquerors. And I would like to know the Eastern European opinion on Iraq. Can the Middle East be stabilized with Hussein there? Thank you.

AS: First, thank you for your comments. Well, you are right about 1956, and of course 1956 is a very strong legacy of Hungarians. But please make a difference between sovereignty and freedom. We might have to surrender some of our sovereignty to the European Union and that’s all right if that’s a guarantee for our participation and our freedom and prosperity. Now on how we would be welcome in Iraq. I think that is a little premature question to ask because I don’t know if we will have to enter Iraq, I still hope that we might be able to find a peaceful solution to the crisis. I just want to tell you about the Iraqi people, that they are well-educated, they are a lay nation which has an enormous source of wealth, and they have all the ingredients to become a strong, democratic nation if they are rid of their dictatorial regime.

CD: Akron, Ohio.

Caller 3: I feel that this administration, our administration in this country is just, they already have the ball rolling for war, and I just don’t think that it’s right. I oppose this President, I think it’s wrong. I hear you talking, this is for peace, but there is an old saying: violence breeds violence. I just don’t see how any of this is going to solve anything. And I do believe that this war is for oil, oil translates to dollars. And I spent about six years in the Navy and I was in France and in a couple of countries and I was told that, right off the bat, that they don’t like Americans but they like American dollars. With that being said, everything was fine. But, I think this war is more for oil and it translates into money for whoever supports this administration.

AS: Well, I don’t think this war is about oil. And let me just take a little piece of your question that was a pretty long question, but let me just take a little piece of that, and that’s about anti-American sentiments in Europe. That’s terrible. Just like anti-European sentiments in the United States are terrible. We have to fight both, and I think it is the responsibility of our leaders, and it’s the responsibility of both Europeans and Americans to make sure that this does not get out of hand. And sometimes people get pretty emotional about each other’s positions but I really think that Americans are pretty much like European and, let’s face it, Europeans are pretty much like Americans. So I don’t see the reason why we should not able to fight this cancer which if it gets out of hand would be a disaster for us all.

CD: There is an Associated Press article talking about Jacques Chirac and the statements he made yesterday at the European Union, and the feelings by some that there was a threat against some of the Eastern European countries about whether they would be allowed to enter the European Union because of this letter you had mentioned earlier. Hungary is already in the EU, correct? But how do you feel about him talking about Romania, Bulgaria, some of these other countries?

AS: Connie, can I be diplomatic on that? I have read it but I haven’t heard it.

CD: You have read it, but you haven’t heard it. Therefore, no comment, is that what you are saying?

AS: I would not like to comment on that.

CD: Were you surprised to hear it?

AS: I was a little surprised but I don’t know what exactly was said, I don’t know what was the context, so I would rather not comment on that.

CD: You think it might cause a little backlash against the French in some countries?

AS: No, I don’t think so. It shouldn’t.

CD: Next call is from New York. Go ahead, Sir.

Caller 4: Thank you for your comments, Mr. Ambassador. I just wanted to ask you a question. I keep on hearing people talking this war is about oil, and I find it’s an extremely simplistic point of view, because when I look at these events, I see such a real ……… between this and what’s going on now and in the 1930’s, and what ended in being the demise of the League of Nations.  I support the President’s position on trying to take preventive action. I don’t see why we are supposed to wait for photos to come out of Bin Laden and Hussein hanging out together. When you look at history, I mean just look at Stalin, you know, he signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler and was at war with him a year later. And then we were allies with him and then we, you know, he was our enemy during the cold war. What I would like to hear is the Ambassador’s thoughts on is this. I mean, I think President Bush is correct in not waiting for this to happen because everybody, you know, any student of history can tell you that a common enemy sure can make people bury the hatchet in a million other differences they might have.

AS: Yes, I agree with you. This is not about oil. It’s about nuclear, biological and chemical warfare threat, and dictatorships having and acquiring these kind of capabilities, so you are quite right in your assessment. But I would want to warn you. You cannot just discard the public’s concerns and you cannot just discard the international community. The United States is far better off building a broad coalition with its allies, moving together with its European allies, and that’s exactly what is happening. And I am very pleased with the way the efforts have been made in the last couple of months. Sometimes it doesn’t look very easy, but in the end I’m absolutely certain that the United States and Europe will move together on this issue.

CD: Washington, D.C.

Caller 5: Yes, Mr. Ambassador I’d like to ask you what you think about in Jordan, for example, 90% of the public opinion is against the war. How do you think the king should react? Should he consult with his public opinion, or should he ignore his public opinion?

AS: Well, I am the Ambassador of Hungary and I am not entitled to answer any questions related to problems of internal nature in another country and I’d rather not give you an answer. I think the wise and able leadership of Jordan will be able to deal with this problem without my advice.

CD: The country of Hungary is ruled by what party right now?

AS: It is ruled by a Social Democratic/Liberal coalition, and the conservatives are in the opposition. Sorry, Connie?

CD: No, I was just trying to make that into an American context.

AS: It is a left-of-center kind of government with a very strong emphasis on social welfare policies, but is very stubbornly supporting market economy.

CD: Next caller is Lionel from Kansas.

Caller 6: Yes, Mr. Ambassador. I’d like to welcome you to the United States and I’d like you to go back and tell your people we appreciate all the help they have given us over the years and stuff, but in our last segment they talked about the American Legion and the forming of a world-wide group to help support each other. What do you think Hungary would feel along the lines, are you able to answer a question like that?

CD: It was “foreign legion,” not “American Legion,” but there was a column in this morning’s New York Times proposing the possibility of an American foreign legion, and what that would be like in order to take the pressure off the decreasing number in the United States military.

AS: I think the foreign legion grew out of a historic situation in France, and it’s pretty much a French culture. I don’t think it’s the answer to the problems. Look, in any country the response to the call of the armies is decreasing. I don’t think that would be the answer, but this is not the only initiative or idea I have seen cropping up and trying to solve the problems of armies. Personally, I don’t feel culturally that is something that fits. I would much rather support the idea to build a strong alliance and continue to work together with the NATO allies.

CD: Next is Hartford, Connecticut.

Caller 7: Good morning. I would like to ask, Mr. Ambassador, about the relationship with Hungary and Turkey at the moment. I am kind of aware that Turkey at the moment is the biggest enemy of the Kurds in the North of Iraq and now they have been attacking the Kurds form the North and looks like nobody knows about these things. What is his position on that, how does he protect the Kurdish people from the Turkish people?

AS: Well, two comments on that. First comment is that you do know that Turkey wishes to join the European Union and our message is that we strongly support Turkey’s membership in the European Union, given that Turkey fulfils all the requirements of the European Union, which includes market economy, democratic institutions, and a respect for human rights and minorities. The second thing is, of course, I want to make clear to you that Turkey is a very strong ally, a strong and good ally of Hungary and the other NATO nations, and we work very closely together within the Alliance.

CD: What’s the current economic status in Hungary?

AS: Well, the economy is pretty strong and I want to refer back to the comment I made about American investment. Foreign investments have been crucial in stabilizing the economy. The growth rate is about 3.5 %. There is a huge return on investments and if you want to know, our investment funds have given a better return than many in the world. So I just want to say Hungary is a good place to invest now, and my message to the investors is: come now before it’s too late, because others will be there.

CD: What is your largest industry again?

AS: Our largest industry? You will be surprised. We built an auto industry from scrap. The Audi TT, this beautiful sports-car, is built in Hungary. 90% of all the Audi-Volkswagen engines are built in Hungary. General Motors has plants in Hungary. Suzuki has plants in Hungary. Auto parts makers have plants in Hungary. I’d like to make sure you know that we have huge investments from the information technology sector and biotechnology, which is the next bubble, the next revolution. Hungary has pretty strong positions there. So I call on those who are interested in biotechnology: go to Hungary now, because it is an interesting place of contact.

CD: Ambassador Simonyi, thank you very much for joining us this morning.

AS: Thank you, Connie.